| |
|
|
| |
In 1947 Antonin Artaud the French art critic and playwright, whose
entire life had been a struggle between the sometimes conflicting and sometimes
allied forces of madness and artistic expression, published a slim
volume about a kindred spirit. It was entitled Van Gogh, le
suicide de la societe. The tone of the book, that of barely
controlled fury, seemed to derive from Artaud's identification with the
dead painter. Both men had suffered from sporadic attacks of
mental illness and had been committed to institutions for the insane,
Van Gogh voluntarily for about a year, Artaud against his will for nine
years. Using Van Gogh's case as an example, Artaud announced that
doctors were the natural enemies of artists. Artists were
subversives who challenged a society's established values, while the
doctors who treated them were the guardians of those values, their
un-avowed mission to destroy the artist.
Artaud's rambling indictment named as the villain in Van Gogh's death
the last doctor to treat him. Paul-Ferdinand Gachet, who lived in the
village of Auvers-sur-Oise, about twenty miles from Paris. "If Van
Gogh had not died at 37," Artaud wrote, "I don't need the Grim reaper to
tell me with what supreme masterpieces painting would have been
enriched...."Two days before his death, an evil spirit and improvised
psychiatrist called Doctor Gachet was the direct, efficient, and
sufficient cause of his death.

"I have acquired, in reading Van Gogh's letters to his brother, the firm
and sincere conviction that Dr. Gachet, psychiatrist, in reality hated
Van Gogh as a painter, and above all as a genius."
Artaud, more than fifty years removed from the event, had never met Dr.
Gachet and did not have a shred of evidence to support his accusation.
Dr. Gachet was known to have befriended and helped Van Gogh in the last
period of his life and, when Vincent shot himself, it was Dr. Gachet who
came to his bedside on a Sunday night and dress3ed his would.
Nevertheless, Artaud had a manic intuition that Dr. Gachet was somehow
the cause of Van Gogh's death. Is there any truth to Artaud's
theory, or can it be dismissed as the distorted view of a man who had
himself been mistreated by doctors?
In 1888 Van Gogh was voluntarily committed to an asylum as the result of
a violent scene with Gauguin and the partial mutilation of his left ear.
His brother, Theo, arranged his admission to the sanitarium of
Saint-Paul-de-Mausole on the outskirts of Saint-Remy-de Provence, an
asylum described as "a private establishment devoted to the treatment of
the insane of both sexes," In his letters to his brother, Vincent
described the director, Dr. Peyron, as a gouty little widower who wore
dark glasses; the treatment he used was based on hydrotherapy, and
Vincent had many sessions in the bathtub during the year he spent in Dr.
Peyron's institution.
Vincent started working again at Saint-Paul-de-Mausole. First he
painted what he saw framed in the window of his cell, without the bars.
In July he had a fit, and Dr. Peyron took away his brushes.
Vincent asked his brother to tell D. Peyron that painting was necessary
for him. When he improved, he was allowed to paint in the garden,
surrounded by on-looking inmates, and in the countryside, accompanied by
a guard. The periods of work were interrupted by fits and other
forms of erratic behavior. Once, when the guard was walking behind
him, Vincent turned around and kicked him in the stomach. Then he
apologized, saying he thought the Arles police were after him. Dr.
Peyron, in his report wrote on Van Gogh wrote; "He tried on several
occasions to poison himself, either by swallowing the oil color he
needed for painting, or by drinking kerosene which he stole from the boy
when he was filling the lamps." One interpretation of Vincent's
fits at Saint-Paul-de-Mausole- that they were connected to things in
Theo's life- was advanced in 1953 by the French psychoanalyst Charles
Mauron. Theo, who was working in Paris for the art gallery of
Boussod and Valadon, had become engaged to a girl named Johanna Bonger.
In the year that Vincent spent confined, Theo married Johanna and had a
son by her, whom he named after his brother. Mauron
established that the dates of Vincent's fits closely followed the
arrival of letters from Theo announcing his marriage and the birth of
his son. Mauron's explanation was that Vincent, who was totally
dependent on Theo financially, and had formulated the following
unconscious analysis: Theo is getting married and it is right that he
should devote himself completely to his wife and child. But he is
diverting part of his resources from his family to keep me going, and
part of his affection in his support of me. This is not right, and
I must not allow this situation to continue. But how can I change
it, except by withdrawing from Theo's life, and how can I withdraw
except by destroying myself?
|
| |
Vincent had one crisis in January, 1890. and another in February,
which lasted two months. He wrote Theo that he could not improve
in the asylum, surrounded as he was by madmen.
Their madness, he
felt, was contagious. He asked Theo to find some other place where
he might go, and Theo went to the painter Camille Pissarro for advice.
Pissarro knew a doctor who specialized in nervous ailments and was
friendly with the impressionist group. The doctor, Paul-Ferdinand
Gachet, had a house in the pleasant village of Auvers-sur-Oise where he
had collected the works of Cezanne, Renoir, Manet, and other new
painters. He himself painted under the pseudonym of of Van Ryssel.
Just the man, thought Pissarro, who would understand Vincent's problems.
Theo wrote Vincent on March 29: "I am very happy to be able to tell you
that I met Dr. Gachet, that physician Pissarro mentioned to me. He
looks like a man of understanding. He resembles you a bit....When
I told him how your crises came about, he told me that he didn't believe
it had anything to do with madness, and that if it was what he thought
he could guarantee your recovery...."
Vincent was delighted at the prospect of leaving the asylum and of being
treated by a doctor, who, without even having met him, already thought
he could cure his condition. He urged Theo to press for his
release.
In May, Theo wrote Dr. Gachet: "You had given me hope that under your
care he might recover his normal state....I would be most grateful if
you could find out about an inn or boarding house where he could stay if
he came to Auvers."
Vincent left Saint-Paul-de-Mausole on May 16 and went to the nearby town
of Tarascon to take the train to Paris. Theo, so concerned about
Vincent's traveling alone that he had spent a sleepless night, fetched
him the next day at the Gare de Lyon and took him home to meet his
infant nephew and namesake and his sister-in-law. Johanna was
surprised at how healthy and vigorous he looked. She thought he
was in better condition than Theo.
Vincent wanted to leave for Auvers as soon as possible-Paris made him
nervous-and, on May 19, with a letter of introduction from Theo, he
arrived at Dr. Gachet's house, walking up the twenty-two front steps and
waiting in a drawing room crowded with paintings, bric-a-brac and black
antique furniture. Soon Dr. Gachet appeared, a short man of
sixty-two with a long nose, a prominent chin, extraordinarily bright and
darting eyes, and stiff red hair that stuck out from his head like the
bristles in a hairbrush.
Dr. Gachet told Vincent not to think about his illness, to work quietly,
keep regular hours, and eat moderately. He was sanguine about
Vincent's chances of recovery and prescribed no medication. He
sent the patient to a nearby boarding house, but Vincent quickly found a
more modest establishment on the Place de la Mairie, Chez Ravoux, where
room and board was only 3 francs fifty a day.
Two days later, Vincent wrote Theo and Jo: "I have seen Dr. Gachet, who
gives me the impression of being rather eccentric, but his experience as
a doctor must keep him balanced enough to combat the nervous trouble
from which he certainly seems to be suffering as least as seriously as
I. He piloted me to an inn where they ask 6 francs a day.
All by myself I found one where I shall pay 3.50 fr. a day....the
impression I got of him was not favorable. When he spoke of
Belgium and the days of the old painters, his grief-hardened face grew
smiling again, and I really think that I shall go on being friends with
him and that I shall do his portrait. Then he said "I must work
boldly on, and not think at all of what went wrong with me."
|
| |
Vincent evidently wanted to show his brother, who in each of his
letters enclosed a neatly folded fifty-franc bill, that he had found the
cheapest pension possible. He always kept carefully itemized
accounts, down to the last sou, to show Theo exactly where all of his
money went.
Far more interesting, however, was his first impression of Dr. Gachet.
In the intervals between his fits, Vincent was completely lucid, and in
his letters to Theo he showed a remarkable understanding on the
personalities of others as well as his own. He was not in the
habit of questioning the mental stability of the people he met, for he
knew how precarious the balance of the mind could be. Still, after
a single meeting with Dr. Gachet, Vincent was convinced that he, too,
was unbalanced.
What was there about Gachet to justify Vincent's judgment?
Certainly, he was no ordinary doctor. Born in Lille in 1828, he
was an early convert to homeopathy, the school of medicine that believes
the cure of a disease is effected by minute doses of drugs capable of
inducing symptoms similar to those of the disease being treated.
He was outspoken in his low opinion of surgeons and organic medicine,
but he completed his studies at the school of medicine in Montpellier,
writing his thesis on melancholy. He then practiced in Paris,
where he befriended painters, particularly the impressionists. Cezanne
was his house guest in Auvers, and Manet, Pissarro, and Renoir were all
close friends of his.
In 1883, when Manet's leg became infected and his doctors recommended
amputation, Dr. Gachet went to see him and said he could cure him
without an operation. But before Gachet had a chance to
demonstrate his curative powers, Manet's leg was amputated and he died
ten days later. He did, however, treat Pissarro with homeopathic
remedies, and Renoir had once asked him to treat a little girl, a model,
who was suffering from tuberculosis. Dr. Gachet saw the child, but
on February 25, 1889. Renoir wrote him: "Dear Doctor, the little girl
you were kind enough to look after, unfortunately too late, has died.
I am nonetheless grateful for the relief you brought her, although we
were both convinced it was in vain."
Homeopathic remedies were no more successful in saving Dr. Gachet's own
wife, who died of tuberculosis in 1875, leaving him with a son and
daughter. After her death he fell into periodic fits of
despondence.
Dr. Gachet seemed drawn to anything that was bizarre or extravagant.
He was a free-thinker, a nonconformist, a lover of the new and the
original. He founded the Society for Mutual Autopsy, whose members
agreed to have their bodies cut open after their deaths and their vital
organs examined. He tried in vain to recruit Renoir, telling him
how important it would be for science to have a great artist's brain to
inspect. He was involved in phrenology and palmistry. He
invented anti-rheumatic and anti-constipation powders, and used electric
shock treatment to cure urinary ailments. He thought of himself as
an innovator and a specialist in nervous diseases. Perhaps part of
his attraction to the impressionist movement was that it was dammed by
the establishment of the day.
This, in any case, was the man to whom Theo had confided his sick
brother. In his second letter to Theo and Jo, around the end of
May, Vincent wrote: "Today I saw Dr. Gachet again....He seems very
sensible, but he is as discouraged about his job as a doctor as I am
about my painting. Then I told him that I would gladly swap jobs
with him. He said to me besides, that if the melancholy or
anything else became too much for me to bear, he could easily do
something to lessen its intensity, and that I must not feel awkward
about being frank with him."
|
| |
Dr. Gachet's treatment, although based mainly on infusions of
optimism, seemed to be doing Vincent some genuine good. The doctor was
against confinement and
sensed that Vincent could best improve by living a normal life among
other people and working as well as he could, which was very well
indeed. Van Gogh had started painting at the age of twenty-seven;
thus his entire career as a painter lasted only nine years, during which
time he produced nine hundred paintings and a hundred drawings and water
colors. The seventy days he spent in Auvers, the last seventy days
of his life, were his most productive. He completed seventy
paintings, an average of one a day, and thirty drawings. He would
begin a new canvas before the previous one was dry, rising at dawn and
trudging out into the Oise valley with his easel under his arm,
returning punctually for meals with the other boarders, and retiring at
nine to his whitewashed garret room on the third floor with its one
dormer window.
On Sunday, May 25, Dr. Gachet invited Vincent to lunch in the garden,
after which the doctor handed him a dry point and a polished copper
plate and sat as a model for the only Van Gogh etching in existence,
Portrait of Dr. Paul Gachet. Two days later, Vincent painted
Dr. Gachet's garden. In the beginning of June he wrote his younger
sister Wilhelmina in Holland: "I have found a true friend in Dr. Gachet,
something like another brother, so much do we resemble each other
physically and also mentally. He is a very nervous man himself and
very queer in his behaviors...." Instead of being put off by the doctor's
strange ways, Vincent considered them part of their bond.
On June 4 Vincent wrote Theo, who had been faithfully sending him fifty
franc notes, canvas, sketching paper and tubes of paint, that he was
working on the doctor's portrait, "He certainly seems to me as ill
or distraught as you or me," Vincent wrote, "and he is older and
lost his wife several years ago, but he is very much the doctor, and
his profession and faith still sustain him. We are great friends
already....I am working at his portrait..." Dr. Gachet admired the
portrait so much that he asked Vincent to make a second version, which
was quite different from the first. It had, Vincent wrote Gauguin,
with whom he was reconciled after the falling out at Arles, "the
heart-broken expression of our time." The doctor, who had a theory
for everything, told Vincent that he understood his work by virtue of
his own study of natural history. Vincent, as he saw it, was a
Dutch Rousseau who celebrated nature, producing a peasant art made of
wooden clogs that was nevertheless as refined as Japanese art.
When he saw Vincent's Arlesienne, Dr. Gachet, after some
hesitation, exclaimed: "How difficult it is to be simple!"
In the June 4 letter Vincent mentioned Dr. Gachet's pretty blonde
daughter, Marguerite, for the first time: "I shall most probably also do
the portrait of his daughter, who is nineteen years old, and with whom I
imagine Jo would soon be friends."
Vincent was feeling good and working well, like a highly volatile
substance that a chemist has succeeded in stabilizing. "I also
hope that this feeling I have of being much more master of my brush than
before I went to Arles will last," he wrote in the same letter, "And Dr.
Gachet says that he thinks it most improbable that it [his illness] will
return, and that things are going quite well,....Altogether, father
Gachet is very, yes very like you and me....I feel that he understands
us perfectly and that he will work for you and me to the best of his
power, without any reserve, for the love of art for art's sake." For
Vincent, Dr. Gachet had become the indispensible man, the healer who
understood him and made his work possible. |
| |
As
for Dr. Gachet, he too was convinced that his curative powers would work
on Vincent. "Dr. Gachet came to see me yesterday." Theo
wrote his brother on June 5, "but at any rate he told me that he thought
you entirely recovered, and that he did not see any reason for a return
of your malady."
On June 8 Theo, Jo, and their son came to Auvers to spend the day, and
the infant Vincent played in Dr. Gachet's yard with the numerous dogs,
cats, chickens, pigeons, rabbits and geese. It was a pleasant
Sunday outing, with Vincent relaxed and surrounded by his real and
surrogate families. In the days that followed, Vincent was so
absorbed in his work that he did not write Theo again until the end of
June to describe a new portrait: "Yesterday and the day before I
painted Mlle. Gachet's portrait, which I hope you will see soon; the
dress is red, the wall in in the background green with orange spots, the
carpet red with green spots, the piano dark violet; it is 40 inches high
by 20 inches wide. It is a figure that I enjoyed painting-but it
is difficult. He [Gachet] has promised to make her pose for me
another time at the small organ."
And then this period of intense work and tranquility ended.
Vincent's peace of mind was shattered by a letter Theo sent on June 30.
"We have gone through a period of the greatest anxiety." Theo wrote,
"Our dear little boy has been very ill....at present we do not know what
we ought to do. There are problems....the rats Boussod and Valadon
are treating me as though I had just entered their business, and are
keeping me on a short allowance." Misfortune was piling up on Theo
from several directions. He was thinking of setting himself up as
an independent art dealer, but that would make his financial situation
even more precarious. However, he promised Vincent to keep him
going.
Once again Vincent was reminded that he was entirely dependent on Theo's
support. The letter, although it did not contain a single word of
reproach, reminded Vincent of his great dilemma: the only thing he could
do was paint, but he could not sell his paintings; and Theo and Jo had
to scrimp and save so that Vincent could continue with his painting.
As Mauron suggested, events in Theo's life tended to precipitate
Vincent's crises. And so it was after the June 30 letter.
One of the many works by artist friends that Dr. Gachet kept in
disorderly piles in the rooms and corridors of his house was a painting
by Armand Guillaumin of a woman, naked to the waist, lying
on a bed and holding a little Japanese fan. Vincent admired
Guillaumin. He had visited his studio on the Quai d'Anjou, where
once, to emphasize a point in an argument, he had undressed and fallen
to his knees, Guillaumin had said that he looked like Delacroix's
Tasso among the Madmen. Dr. Gachet's Guillaumin nude was
unframed, and Vincent told him it was unforgivable to leave a
masterpiece without a frame. Gachet promised to have one made by a
local carpenter, who was slow delivering it. Shortly after
receiving Theo's letter, Vincent, seeing the painting still unframed,
stood dumbfounded in front of it and then began shouting at Gachet,
working himself up into an irrational fury until he was screaming
unintelligibly in Dutch, pacing up and down the room. Suddenly he
stopped and dug his right hand deep into the pocket of his trousers.
Dr. Gachet, afraid that he was armed and remembering the time when he
had attacked Gauguin with a razor, managed to remain calm and stared Vincent down until he
skulked out of the room.
In forcing his friendship with Dr. Gachet to the breaking point, Vincent
was following a familiar pattern. With Gauguin, he had formed a
close friendshp, then, without warning, and without reason, had attacked
him. The result of this complicated process of guilt and
unrealized aggression was that he had turned the violence against
himself, cutting off the ear. Gachet's reaction to Vincent's
outburst was like Gauguin's: he avoided him.
|

|
 |
| |
Vincent's
next letter to Theo was distraught and partly incoherent. "I
myself am also trying to do as well as I can," he wrote, "but I will not
conceal from you that I hardly dare count on being always in good
health. And if my disease returns, you will forgive me." He
was warning Theo that his decline had already begun. "I still love
art and life very much," he went on, "but as for ever having a wife of
my own, I have no great faith in that. I rather fear that toward
say forty- or rather say nothing-I declare to know nothing, absolutely
nothing as to what turn this may take." One wonders what prompted
this sudden talk of marriage. Was Vincent thinking of Theo's
family situation, or were his thoughts of marriage prompted by Dr.
Gachet's daughter, Marguerite?
On July 5 Theo wrote that his son was out of danger and asked Vincent to
visit them on the following day, a Sunday. The atmosphere must
have been tense, the baby still sick and Theo still quarreling with his
employers and afraid of losing his job. Was something said about
the burden of supporting Vincent? The slightest hint, a random
remark expressed in a moment of impatience, would have been enough to
unsettle Vincent in his already nervous and sensitized state.
Whatever was said, Vincent's anxiety was evident in the first letter he
wrote Theo and Jo after his final Paris visit. "I myself am far
from having reached any kind of tranquility," he said. I very
much fear that I too was distressed, and I think it strange that I do
not in the least know under what conditions I left-if it is at 150
francs a month paid in three installments as before. Theo fixed
nothing and so to begin with I left in confusion. Would
there be a way of seeing each other again more calmly? ...
"I have an interest in my little nephew and am anxious for his
well-being: since you were good enough to call him after me, I should
like him to have a soul less unquiet than mine, which is
foundering."
In this letter Vincent once again revealed his constant preoccupation:
was Theo going to continue to support him, to send him fifty-franc notes
folded into his letters? And if he was, would Vincent not be
diverting resources from his infant nephew and namesake? There was
no solution.
At the same time, the other anchor in his life, Dr. Gachet, had
abandoned him. Vincent's letter went on: "Now about Dr. Gachet.
I went to see him the day before yesterday, I did not find him in....I
think we must not count on Dr. Gachet at all. First of all, he is
sicker than I am, I think, or shall we say just as much, so that's that.
Now when one blind man leads another blind man, don't they both fall
into the ditch?" Thus, the friend who had understood min
perfectly, who had started him working again, was now a blind man who
could not find his way, and who threatened to drag Vincent down with
him.
In response to a reassuring message from Jo that their situation had
improved, both with regard to little Vincent's health and Theo's job,
Vincent wrote: "Jo's letter was really like a gospel to me, a
deliverance from the agony which had been caused by the hours I had
shared with you, which were a bit too difficult and trying for us all.
It was no slight thing when we all felt our daily bread was in danger,
no slight thing when for reasons other than that we felt that our means
of subsistence were fragile.
"Back here, I still felt very sad and continued to feel the storm which
threatens you weighing on me too. What was to be done-you see.
I generally try to be fairly cheerful, but my life is also threatened at
the very root, and my steps are also wavering."
"I feared-not altogether but yet a little-that being a burden to you,
you felt me to be rather a thing to be dreaded, but Jo's letter proves
to me clearly that you understood that for my part I am as much in toil
and trouble as you are....I have painted three more big canvases.
They are vast fields of wheat under troubled skies, and I did not need
to go out of my way to try to express sadness and extreme loneliness."
Vincent, so he said, was delivered from his suffering by Jo's letter,
and now he went back to work, painting more sweeping landscapes, as well
as the flag covered Auvers town hall on July 14 and the funeral
Crows over a Wheatfield. The last letter he sent Theo, dated
July 23, avoided the subject of his emotional state and dealt with his
work and practical matters like obtaining paints.
|
| |
On Sunday evening, July 27, 1890,
the Ravoux family, monsieur and madame and their two young daughters,
sat down to dinner with all their boarders but Vincent,
who was usually punctual at meals. They wondered where he was.
They were taking the air outside the cafe in the warm summer evening
when Vincent passed them and climbed the twisting staircase to his
whitewashed garret room. Adeline Ravoux, whose portrait Vincent
had once painted, Could still remember the scene in vivid detail more
than sixty years later. "It was so dark only my mother noticed he
was holding his side like a man in pain," she recalled in a 1953
interview for the Paris literary weekly Les Nouvelles Literaaires.
"She said to my father: You'd better have a look, I don't think M.
Vincent is well."
Through the door of Vincent's room, M. Ravoux could hear him moan.
The door was locked. When Ravoux let himself in, Vincent showed
him a red stain on his shirt. "But what have you done?" M. Ravoux
asked. "I've shot myself, I only hope this time I've succeeded,"
Vincent replied.
Ravoux sent for Dr. Mazery, who came twice a week to Auvers to attend to
the villagers, but he was not at home. Someone went to get Dr.
Gachet, who had just returned from a day of fishing with his son on the
Oise River. He arrived with his emergency medical bag and, being
an advocate of electric shock treatment, his little electric coil.
The Ravoux had never met Dr. Gachet before. "He did not practice
in Auvers, and had never come to our house," Adeline Ravoux said in her
interview. "When he arrived we had the impression that he and M.
Vincent did not know one another....My father always maintained that
they never exchanged the slightest word."
Dr. Gachet examined Vincent's wound by candlelight. He saw that
Vincent had shot himself too low and too far to the side to touch the
heart. The wound, at the edge of the left side of his rib cage,
formed a small, dark red circle, surrounded by a purple halo. A
thin stream of blood came from it. No vital organ seemed to be
affected. The bullet appeared to have stopped somewhere in
Vincent's back, probably near the spinal column.
Vincent, unlike a man suffering from a serious chest wound, did not seem
to be in a state of shock. He was lucid and composed, sat up in
bed, and asked if he could smoke, pointing to his pipe and tobacco in a
pocket of his blue blouse. It was out of the question for Dr.
Gachet to try to extract the bullet. He had only candlelight to
operate by, and surgery of the thorax was, in any case, fairly crude.
The obvious thing to do was hospitalize Vincent, if only to prevent him
from doing further damage to himself. The town of Pontoise,
which had a hospital, was less than six miles away. But Dr. Gachet
did not do the obvious thing. After dressing the wound, he left
Vincent in his airless room. Anton Hirschig, a Dutch painter who
was also staying at the boarding house, visited Vincent's deathbed and
reported: "It was swelteringly hot up there under the roof."
Later that night, two gendarmes arrived to question Vincent.
Adeline Ravoux recalled in her interview that Vincent would not answer
their questions, "What I have done is nobody else's business," he said.
"I am free to do what I like with my own body." The gendarmes were
unable to learn where Vincent had gone to shoot himself or how he had
come into possession of a gun.
When Dr. Gachet had asked for Theo's current address in Paris, Vincent
had refused to give it to him, but the doctor had managed to send Theo a
note via an art dealer: "I am terribly sorry to trouble your rest.
However, I feel it is my duty to write you immediately. I was
summoned at nine o'clock at, night today Sunday by your brother Vincent.
When I came to him, I found him very badly off. He had shot
himself."
Theo arrived in the morning of July 28, and Vincent told him: "Don't
cry, I did it for the good of all of us." When he saw Vincent
sitting up in bed calmly puffing on his
pipe, Theo hoped he would recover. This, no more was done to save
Vincent, who died in Theo's arms at one-thirty on the morning of July
29, some twenty-eight and a half hours after Dr. Gachet had been to see
him, He was thirty-seven years old.
Dr. Gachet did a deathbed charcoal drawing of Vincent, signed with his
pseudonym, Van Ryssel. Vincent's body was placed in a coffin that
had been lifted onto the Ravoux billiard table, and he was buried on
July 30 in a corner of the Auvers cemetery. Dr. Gachet spoke, but
his words were drowned in his own sobs. After the funeral, according to
Adeline Ravoux, "M. Theo asked Dr. Gachet to take the remaining
paintings. He didn't have to be asked twice, and with his son's
help he rolled up canvas after canvas."
Dr. Gachet had written Theo that Vincent had asked for him, which was
untrue. He had been called because the first doctor, Mazery, was
not at home. In any case, he did nothing to save Vincent.
Although he called himself a specialist in nervous diseases, nothing in
his behavior suggest that he understood that a bungled suicide is a cry
for help. He left Vincent to die in his garret room, grossly
underestimating the gravity of his wound and not bothering to have him
hospitalized, an act of negligence that would at best be called
malpractice. And, once Vincent was dead, he threw himself into the
role of the grieved friend and gathered up Vincent's canvases with
greedy dispatch. All in all, Dr. Gachet leaves a distasteful
impression.
We should not, however, accept Artaud's view of Gachet as "the direct,
efficient, and sufficient cause " of Van Gogh's death. For it
seems clear that we are dealing here with two unbalanced men. One
was the patient, while the other, unfortunately, was the doctor.
When Vincent became angry over the unframed Guillaumin, Dr. Gachet
abandoned his patient. A mercurial, often thoughtless person,
perhaps Gachet did not realize how grave it is for a doctor, who
embodies the promise of health, to ignore the person he is supposed to
be helping. If he did realize how dependent Vincent was on him,
then his neglect of his patient was criminal-in the moral if not the
legal sense. In any case, it is a fact that at the very moment
that Vincent was taking upon himself all of Theo's problems, Dr. Gachet
was divesting himself of the problem Vincent represented in his life.
|
|
The problem may have been more
than that between patient and doctor, if we are to believe one of the
foremost Van Gogh experts, Marc-Edo Tralbaut, who has
devoted his life to the study of the painter and who personally knew Dr.
Gachet's son and daughter. He suggests that Vincent had formed an
attachment to Dr. Gachet's daughter and was told by the doctor that he
must stop seeing Marguerite. When Vincent abruptly brought up the
topic of marriage in his letter to Theo, he was thinking of Marguerite
and his last chance to found a family-only to be rebuffed by her father,
a man he considered his friend and helper. When I talked to M.
Tralbaut, who lives in Van Gogh country, near Arles, he told me that he
believed Marguerite Gachet had returned Vincent's feelings. He
said he had been told by a girlhood friend of Marguerite's "that she had
fallen in love with Van Gogh."
All this is getting perilously close to True Confessions, and
it is impossible to verify. We do know however, that Marguerite Gachet
suffered serious depression after Vincent's death, that she never
married, and that she lived as a recluse in Auvers, where even her own
neighbors seldom saw her.
And we do know that when Dr. Gachet came to Vincent's side on July 27,
he was no longer a friend. The two men, according to Adeline
Ravoux, did not exchange a single word. Whatever there was between
them, whether it was Marguerite or simply an accumulation of mutual ill
will between two unstable men, died with Vincent. Dr. Gachet would
not discuss it.
Vincent left Theo three things: his Auvers paintings and drawings, many
of which Theo gave to Dr. Gachet: an un-mailed letter found on his
person, in which Vincent said, "I tell you again that I shall always
consider you to be something more than a simple dealer in Corots, that
through my mediation you have your part in the actual production of some
canvases, which will retain their calm even in the catastrophe....Well,
my own work, I am risking my life for it and my reason has half
foundered because of it": and his madness. Theo's mind snapped.
It was as if the true nature of their pact had been that Theo assumed
the financial burdens for both brothers while Vincent dealt with their
demons. So interwoven were their lives that it was not only his
own mental balance that Vincent was struggling to keep, it was Theo's.
Theo remained on excellent terms with Dr. Gachet. They exchanged
several friendly letters. It never even crossed Theo's mind that
Dr. Gachet was in any way responsible for his brother's death-in fact,
Theo and Johanna still considered Gachet the Van Gogh family doctor.
On October 10, 1890, almost two and a half months after Vincent's death,
Dr. Gachet received a letter from Johanna Van Gogh's brother: "Since
yesterday, my brother-in-law Van Gogh has been in a state of
overexcitement that has us seriously worried....The overexcitement is
due to a quarrel with his employers, as the result of which he wants to
set himself up independently without delay. The memory of his
brother haunts him to such a point that he quarrels with all those who
disagree with him."
Two Days later, with Dr. Gachet's consent, Theo was committed to a
private asylum, the Maison Dubois, at 200 Faubourg Saint-Denis. He
improved and was allowed to go to Holland and see his family. But
the illness had attacked his body as well as his mind, and he died in
Utrecht of general paralysis on January 25, 1891, at the age of
thirty-three. He was buried there, but his body was later exhumed
and reburied in Auvers beside his brother's. Their remains lie
under identical tombstones, as close as their psyches had been in life.
Dr. Gachet continued practicing and exhibiting his canvases, signed Van
Ryssel, at the Salon des Independants in Paris. He took part in a
signboard contest, submitting a picture of a pig for a charcuterie.
He died in 1909 at the age of eighty. |
| |
| Journalist-novelist Ted Morgan was born
on the same day, March 30. as Van Gogh. |
|
|
The following presentation is an image of the original article as
written by Ted Morgan. The above was retyped and enlarged for ease
of reading.
|
|